El correo electrónico, una herramienta útil en la consulta monográfica de cefaleas

Email in a dedicated headache clinic: experience gained over a five-year period

Abstract

in English, Spanish

TITLE:

Correo electronico de una consulta monografica de cefaleas: experiencia durante cinco años.
Introduccion. El correo electronico puede facilitar la comunicacion entre niveles. Nuestros medicos de atencion primaria disponen del correo de la consulta monografica de cefaleas (CMC) desde noviembre de 2009, por lo que se pretende analizar la utilizacion del correo electronico durante cinco años. Pacientes y metodos. Recogimos prospectivamente datos de los correos enviados hasta octubre de 2014. Las preguntas se clasificaron en necesidad de derivacion a la CMC (grupo 1), evolucion de casos atendidos en la CMC (grupo 2), formacion en cefaleas (grupo 3) o tratamiento de la cefalea padecida por el propio medico de atencion primaria como paciente (grupo 4). Resultados. Analizamos 274 correos. Las consultas mensuales se han incrementado (de 1,5 al mes durante el primer año a 7,5 al mes durante el quinto). El 10,2% de los correos provenia de centros de salud rurales y el 89,8% de centros de salud urbanos. Se contestaron en 2 ± 2,8 dias (rango: 0-24 dias). En el grupo 1 se encuadraron 130 consultas (47,4%), y en 60 se recomendo (46,2%) la derivacion por via normal, en 47 (36,2%) la preferente y en 23 (17,6%) la no derivacion. En el grupo 2 se incluyeron 125 correos (45,7%), y en 80 no fue necesaria nueva cita o adelanto de la prevista (64%). Trece consultas (4,7%) se clasificaron en el grupo 3 y seis (2,2%) en el grupo 4. Conclusiones. Nuestros medicos de atencion primaria manejan cada vez mas el correo electronico de la CMC. Permite detectar pacientes en los que procede un adelanto de cita, bien primera visita o revision, o resolver cuestiones sin necesidad de derivacion. Es eficaz para la atencion del medico con cefalea y como herramienta de formacion continuada.

INTRODUCTION:

The use of email can facilitate communication between the different levels of an organisation. Our primary care physicians have had an email service in the dedicated headache clinic (DHC) since November 2009, and our aim is therefore to analyse the use of email over that five-year period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

Data concerning the emails sent up until October 2014 were collected prospectively. The questions were classified as need for referral to the DHC (group 1), progress made by the cases seen in the DHC (group 2), training in headaches (group 3) or the treatment of the headaches suffered by primary care physicians themselves as patients (group 4).

RESULTS:

A total of 274 email messages were analysed. Monthly consultations have increased (from 1.5 per month during the first year to 7.5 per month during the fifth). Findings showed that 10.2% of the email messages came from rural health centres and 89.8% were sent from urban health centres. Replies were sent within 2 ± 2.8 days (range: 0-24 days). Altogether 130 consultations were classified as belonging to group 1 (47.4%), in which referral through the normal channel was recommended in 60 cases (46.2%), via the preferential channel in 47 (36.2%) and non-referral was suggested in 23 cases (17.6%). Group 2 included 125 emails (45.7%) and in 80 cases there was no need to make a new appointment or to bring forward the existing one (64%). Thirteen visits (4.7%) were classified into group 3 and six (2.2%) in group 4.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our primary care physicians are using the email of the DHC on an increasingly more frequent basis. Its use makes it possible to detect patients whose appointment -whether the first or a follow-up- needs to be brought forward, as well as allowing issues to be solved without the need for referral. It is effective for the treatment of physicians who themselves have headaches and as a tool for continuing education.